Book Log 2006 #38: Desperate Networks by Bill Carter

The TV critic for The New York Times, Carter's book The Late Shift is the definitive story of the battle to succeed Johnny Carson. I don't know if Desperate Networks will turn out to be the definitive history of the changing TV landscape of the early 21st century - especially as it doesn't really address the way networks are reacting and interacting with new media to distribute content - but it does capture the way the network TV landscape has changed over the last 5 years.

The books is blend of show development stories and network politics. Both are interesting, and seeing the interplay is instructive for those of us who enjoy TV but don't really delve too deeply into the business end of it (outside of making mocking comments on fourth-rate TV blogs). I now have a begrudging admiration for Les Moonves, awe at Jeff Zucker's rise at NBC even as the network went into the toilet, and confusion over ABC canning Lloyd Braun even though he pretty much gave them Lost, not to mention sadness over the end of useful network news as we know it.

On top of being informative, the book was pretty well written, outside of some clunky transitions between chapters (which would be hard to avoid, trying to cover four networks). Highly recommended if you're interested in how TV is made.

Book Log 2006 # 37: The Pale Horesman by Bernard Cornwell

The second book in the trilogy about Alfred the Great. While still focusing on Uhtred, the Englishman raised by Danes who can't choose one side over the other, we do get to see much more of Alfred in this book, as he is sent into hiding by the Danes and plans a way to start winning England back.

It's a pretty good middle book, avoiding getting too bogged down in either carrying the story forward or setting up the ending. Looking forward to the conclusion.

Last night's debate did settle one thing for me: I'm not voting for Tom Reilly.

I have no problem with his being aggressive, given that he's in danger of going from first to worst. The problem I had was that his aggression was so often misplaced. Using a question on tax rollbacks to accuse Chris Gabrieli's campaign of leaking a memo about Jean St. Fleur's money problems? It was like the early days of keyword ads, when using a term like "bait and switch" would get you ads for fishing equpiment or electrical supplies.

It was clear that Reilly had some shots to take, but he was too quick on the trigger. The first question put directly to him was about some of his campaign's indecisiveness, a much better platform from which to make an accusation.

(For what it's worth, Gabrieli denies the leak, and the person who supposedly had access to the report denies ever seeing it. She's also not Gabrieli's campaign chair, as Reilly claimed.)

Reilly's tenacity would have worked for him if he had solid ideas to back them up. Instead, he said that voters knew what they were getting in him, which after last night may not be the most comforting thing.

For his part, Gabrieli stayed mostly above the fray. He had the most concrete connection between the big picture and specific ideas and policies. He used humor effectively in a tight spot - deflecting a question about his self-financed campaign by noting that his wife and kids were also curious about the spending - and came off as a bit wonky and endearingly dorky.

Deval Patrick was, not surprisingly, the best in terms of delivery. He was also quick with the jab, as he had some effective responses to Reilly's attacks on his finances. I thought Patrick gave a good summary of his tax position, and came the closest to successfully arguing why we should increase funding to state universities as a way to encourage growth, but was pretty vague about how he planned to pay for everything.

Everyone was vague about the way they'd fund the recently-passed health care plan, which is somewhat understandable. It's a law that, whoever becomes governor, will only bring criticism when it's either underfunded or funded at the expense of other programs. I don't think anyone wants to handle this one until they have to, but it'd have been nice to at least get an idea what the candidates were thinking outside of increasing efficiency and cutting overhead.

In any case, this was probably one of the more successful televised political debates in recent memory, in that it helped make distinctions between candidates. Perhaps too many, if you're Tom Reilly.

Desperation is beginning to rear its head in the Democratic gubenatorial primary, as Tom Reilly is running an ad asking what his opponents have to hide, given that neither are releasing their tax returns for public scrutiny. The ad tries to weave in a hint of fraud and milk the legacy of Ken Lay and his ilk.

And while I'm curious why neither Gabrieli nor Patrick have done this, neither has the attendant hint of scandal to make me think they are hiding something. More likely they're trying to downplay net worth in order to allow voters to keep thinking of the lieutenant governor as the wealthy candidate. Which is kind of a pipe dream, when you're either a venture capitalist setting records for campaign spending or a former general counsel for Texaco and Coke.

We'll probably see more on this tonight when the candidates debate. I also expect we'll hear more on a couple of the major themes brought out at a candidate round-table last night: Reilly's role in the Big Dig fiasco and Patrick's new interest in rolling back the income tax.

Finally got around to making a group for ESPN.com's Eliminator Challenge:

Name: Eliminator Challenged
Password: Eliminator

Time for a new regular feature which will have three benefits: it gives me something else to post about, will help get me back into college football a bit, and will annoy Greg. Announcing:

The Blogalicious College Football Top Ten

1. Texas (def. North Texas 56-7). As defending champs, they get to be number 1 until someone knocks them off, which may not take too long given their Next opponent:

2. Ohio State (def. Northern Illinois 35-12). I think they'll find going into Austin a bit more of a challenge than this home opener. But they've got the tools to pull out a victory and return the favor for last year. Next opponent: Texas.

3. Notre Dame (def. Georgia Tech 14-10). I tend to think that ND is a little over-rated (I know, you're stunned), but they gutted out a good win on the road, so I'll cut them some slack. Besides, they've got back to back top 20 games to prove that they belong this high. Next opponent: Penn State.

4. USC (def. Arkansas 50-14). They aren't as glamorous as the last couple of teams, but they can clearly score points. Arkansas is down a bit, but putting 50 on the Razorbacks at home isn't too shabby. Next opponent: Nebraska (Sept. 20).

5. West Virginia (def. Marshall 42-10). I know, slag the Big East all you want, but if the Mountaineers get by Louisville on November 2, they could wind up playing for the national title. Next opponent: Eastern Washington.

6. Auburn (def. Washington State 40-14). This might stand up as the most sluggish 26 point win of the season. Hope they find some urgency before they play LSU in a couple of weeks. Next opponent: at Mississippi State.

7. Florida (def. Southern Mississippi 34-7). OK, I didn't see a single play of this game, so I'm going off rep for now. That may be all they need next week. Next opponent: Central Florida.

8. LSU (def. Louisiana-Lafayette 45-3). See my entry for Florida. Next opponent: Arizona.

9. Florida State (def. Miami 13-10). It wasn't pretty, but it was effective. They've certainly got the defense to keep the score low. Now they just need the offense to make sure that their score isn't kept lower. Next week should be a good opportunity for a tune-up. Next opponent: Troy.

10. Montana State (def. Colorado 19-10). Remember when Colorado was good? If you don't, this season doesn't look primed to serve as a reminder. The Bobcats defend the honor of Big Sky country, as Montana took it on the chin at Iowa. Just hope they don't get caught by a lower-divison opponent in a twist of fate. Next opponent: Chadron State.

As we turn the calendar to September, there are only 18 days until the Democratic primary here in Massachusetts, and I have no idea who I am going to vote for at the top of the ticket. The choices are:

Tom Reilly, current state attorney general. He was the leader out of the gate, and it was his race to lose, a position he's lived up to in screwing up his choice for a running mate, losing the party endorsement, and admitting that he's not particularly political (although I admit that I find that kind of endearing).

Reilly's campaign has been the most traditional, with ads comparing his record to that of the Romney/Healey administration. He's also started the in-fighting, calling for an immediate rollback of the state income tax, which neither opponent favors.

Deval Patrick is running a more grassroots campaign, which is interesting given that he's got some national notice from his time as an assistant AG during Clinton's term in office. He clearly has some party cachet, as he won the state party endorsement at their convention.

Based on his ads, all I can tell about Patrick is that he grew up poor, got himself into Harvard, wants to improve education and create jobs, and has the tacit support of Barack Obama (he appears in one ad where Patrick is making a speech). A Reilly ad notes that Patrick wants to keep the state income tax at its current level, a stand Patrick defends by arguing that a lower income tax would lead to cuts in local aid, which would require increases in local (mostly property) taxes. Patrick had also put forward the idea that localities could increase the meal tax to raise funds.

Chris Gabrieli is the most visible candidate, given that he's bankrolled an ad push that's lasted most of the summer. The ads tout his experience in creating jobs in the private sector, and his role in improving education through after school programs. He's recently taken on all the major candidates over taxes, calling for a reduction plan that uses a percentage of surplus tax revenue to fund the next year's cut. He's also backing the Cape Wind project, but is for any idea that gets results. In fact, "getting results" is pretty much the theme of his campaign.

I'd also like to note that he has one entertaining ad where he's having a mock press conference on education where he's fielding questions from his five kids. Let's just say the idea of longer school days doesn't appeal. His wife then interrupts and says she wants to get results in Gabrieli taking out the garbage.

I suppose the biggest problem with any of these guys is that they've not taken too much time to differentiate themselves from each other. Only the tax issue has done that, and even then that's only flared up this week. I'd expect more differences to come out as election day nears, but this may be muted by a desire not to give Kerry Healey, the current lieutenant governor and putative Republican nominee (she's running unopposed), too much ammo for later.

Anyway, I'm pretty firmly undecided. And this hasn't helped at all. Great.

This would be the time that I would normally invite one and all to join groups for various football-related games at ESPN.com., but taking a page from W I'm going to be a uniter, not a divider.

If you're interested in participating in either of ESPN.com's football pick 'em games, please join the Barker Gang (password Barker) at your earliest convenience. I don't believe Craig has a group for Gridiron Challenge, so I did make one:

Group: Gridiron Challenged
Password: Gridiron

I'm also trying to make one for their Eliminator game, but I'm getting some sort of error. Though this is also a good time to plug Craig's similar game, which he runs. If you're not participating, you should be. Go over to his blog and drop him a line to get on the mailing list.

While most folks will point to getting swept at home by the Y@nkees as the point in the 2006 Red Sox season when everything went to hell, I'd more point to the sweeps foisted upon us by the Royals and Mariners. The Sox are the only team to get swept by both clubs this season. Which is something, when you consider that both are in the bottom 5 of ESPN.com's current power rankings.

(It should also be noted that the Sox have a slim 9-8 edge over Tampa Bay, the other AL team in the bottom 5. They also swept the Nationals, who are in the bottom 5 as well. Most of these games took place in the first half of the season, for what it's worth.)

And then you have Ortiz going on the shelf until doctors can sort out his irregular heartbeat problems. Talk about a metaphor for the team at present.

Book Log 2006 #36: The World is Flat by Thomas Friedman

Between the hullabaloo about outsourcing jobs overseas and all the commercials focused at how a company is the one to choose to help you take advantage of the new global economy, it'd be hard not to have some exposure to this book's main idea: changes in technology and communications have "flattened" the world and made it easy - and often cheaper - to create and collaborate with individuals and companies regardless of their physical location.

Friedman sees this as a good thing, and spends most of the book pointing out how this flattening will benefit everyone, even if it does present an opportunity for those who would use the flattening for nefarious purposes. I think he may be a little too optimistic about how this will all work out, but his arguments are reasoned and give hope that it will all, indeed, work out.

Looks like I've been wrong on two accounts in the last week.

First, the impromptu law enforcement convention that was held on our street was apparently not drug-related at all. According to our local weekly's police log, the response was for a domestic dispute involving a knife. The amount of police response seemed a little excessive, but the next entry in the log - about 20 minutes later - was from a guy who was bleeding. Better safe than sorry, I suppose.

Should have seen this coming, given that all the previous police visits we've seen to the building have been domestic dispute-related. But expectations tend to climb when you see guys in vests and such.

My other boo-boo was denigrating the Little Leaguers from Portsmouth. Turns out they got thumped in their second game, but did well enough in their other games to get out of pool play. They did lose a US semifinal game in pretty convincing fashion, but weren't the pushovers I originally thought they were. Mea culpa.

Random sporting thoughts:

* I'm in agreement with Cooch that it's time to stick a fork in the '06 edition of the Red Sox. Funny that with all the ailiment that plagued the Y@nkees, it's the Sox who've had more trouble dealing with injuries. It'll be interesting to see how things go on the pitching front, given that Schilling, Wells, and Wakefield aren't getting any younger (though as a knuckler, Wake could likely pitch for another 5 years), and the pitchers who've been brought up don't seem to be quite ready yet.

I never thought I would long for a weekly appearance by Derek Lowe, but here we are. I'm looking forward to seeing him, Nomar, and Grady in the playoffs.

* It's Little League World Series time again, and I'm a little less into it given the lack of local representation (the New England entry is from Portsmouth, and if thier first game is any indication, their stay in Williamsport will be short). Thought I was interested to see that a kid dropping the f-bomb - and a coach's reaction of smacking the kid - is leading ESPN to put a 5 second delay on the broadcast. Which is kind of sad, because I have to think foul-mouthed 12 year olds would be a ratings draw. It worked for The Bad News Bears (the original, at least).

* I will admit to watching almost three quarters of the Pats exhibition game against the Cardinals, and I'm trying not to get overly positive. Even with their improvements, it was still the Cardinals. Or, for a large portion of the game, the Cardinals back-ups. I'm still sanguine about the Pats' fortunes at linebacker, though Junior Seau should help. I'm also wondering when the amity between Corey Dillon and Laurence Maroney will break down. I'm guessing around week six.

* If I'm setting weeks when things will happen, I'm also putting in week eight as the week where Matt Leinart replaces Kurt Warner as the starter in Arizona. I'm still undecided as to if the change will be due to performance or injury.

* Moving in an entirely different direction, I was buoyed somewhat by Phil Kessel's decision to leave Minnesota and sign with the Bruins, more for what it might do for the latter. There's two thirds of a very interesting, young line with Kessel and Patrice Bergeron.

That being said, college hockey has lost a lot of players to the NHL this off-season, which hopefully isn't presaging a trend.

* Going overseas, the Phonak cycling team is shutting its doors. They were going to be sold at the end of the season, but the new buyers pulled out, proving that any publicity is not good publicity. Put this with the trouble the Liberty Seguros team had finding new sponsorship (who were then repaid with the entire team getting dropped from the Tour de France), and you have to think that there's not going to be a lot of new money going into pro cycling until things get cleaned up. If ever.

So I was preparing to go down to the train station last night to pick up my wife when I heard the siren of a fire engine. That's not that unusual, as we live no more than a quarter-mile from a fire station.

The siren grew louder, and the truck pulled down my street. That's also not that unusual, as there's an apartment building right around the corner from us that gets a visit from the fire department at least twice a week.

What was unusual was when the truck stopped right by our building. What was very unusual was what I saw when I looked out the window: no fewer than a half-dozen police cars (marked and unmarked), and a variety of law enforcement personnel. Some were uniformed, some plainclothed, some carried portable battering rams, and one had some sort of rifle. There was at least one visible bulletproof vest.

All of these folks were out to visit an apartment in the building next door, which is clearly the sketchy building of the three on our part of the street. Not sure what the reason was for the visit, though I think the first conclusion - drugs - is likely correct.

I don't suspect we're going to get this sort of entertainment in the new neighborhood, though I can't say that saddens me.

Book Log 2006 #35: The Planets by Dava Sobel

Mixing astronomy with mythology, art, music, and history, this book gives a body-by-body account of the solar system, including not only the planets by also the sun and the Moon. It's not an unusual approach for Sobel - both Longitude and Galileo's Daughter take a more literary approach to scientific subjects - and it works pretty well here, though I would have appreciated a bit more heft.

Of course, future editions will be able to do that now that we have three new planets to contend with. As you've likely heard, a panel of the International Astronomers Union has added Ceres, Charon, and a tenth planet nicknamed Xena to the planetary rolls. They've apparently part of a new subclass of planets called plutons (Pluto, as you might guess from the name, is one as well). And, given the definition they've devised to determine if a body is a planet, the list may grow to over 100 planets. There are apparently 53 known bodies in the solar system that meet the panel's planetary definition.

I'm not sure I buy this, but not being an astronomer I may just be reacting to change (I also didn't like it when Pluto got cut, so more credence to that theory). But I think part of it, too, is that I dislike the idea that planets are just random hunks of rock. Planets, to me, are bodies of color - our blue planet, Mars as the red planet and the vibrant hues of Jupiter, and the cool blues and greens of Neptune and Uranus. I also don't like the idea of planets that are smaller than our Moon. Call me terracentric.

Book Log 2006 # 34: The Last Kingdom by Bernard Cornwell

Best known for a series of historical novels featuring British soldier Richard Sharpe, this is this first book in a trilogy focused on King Alfred the Great and how he saved England from conquest by the Danes.

Even so, Alfred barely shows up in the first book. The main character is a Northumbrian who spends his time bouncing between the Danish and English camps after his father is killed and he is captured by the Danes. Raised among them, he's stuck between camps, as he's not truly a Dane, and the English distrust him for his Danish ways.

It's solid historical fiction, and great reading for the commute - as long as your train ride doesn't end before a climactic battle.

Book Log 2006 #33: Moondust by Andrew Smith

What do you do to top walking on the moon? That is, in some respects, the thesis of Moondust, where the author interviews all of the living astronauts who have trod on the dusty lunar surface. Interspersed with his own memories of moon landings and reflections on the space program, Smith discovers that the trip was life-altering for all of the men. It's just that the alteration wasn't always for the best.

It's an interesting idea for a book, and the descriptions of the interviews are as telling as the actual discussion. From Neil Armstrong's reticence to Buzz Aldrin's borderline paranoia to Charlie Duke's New Age leanings, it's clear that this once in a lifetime experience was liberating for some, but is an albatross for others.

Anyone interested in space or recent history would enjoy this book quite a bit, and the book is well-written and engaging enough to keep readers with a passing interest in the subject around until the end.

So I turn the big 3-7 today. OK, 37 isn't really "the big" anything.

With the work anniversary yesterday and the birthday today, I started thinking about what other people had accomplished by their 37th birthday. So I decided to find out the Internet way: go on Wikipedia and check the first 10 people to come up when I click on the "random article" link.

We have:

Paul Riley, who I assume was acting by the time he was 37. From the picture, I'm assuming he found his greatest success later, which is kind of comforting.

Nathan Eldon Tanner, who got himself elected to Alberta's provincial legislature before a later career in the Mormon church.

Tancredo Neves was in the middle of his rise in Brazilian politics, getting elected to the state legislature in Minas Gerais.

I have no idea what Nuala Ahern was doing, but I assume she was protesting against something.

I also am not quite sure what Pete Stemkowski was doing, but I assume it was related to making the transition from hockey player to hockey radio guy.

Zafar Ali Khan had, by this time, moved to Lahore and took over the Zamindar, a newspaper started by his father. According to the linked bio, he became known as the "father of Urdu journalism." Granted, he wasn't that when he was 37, but it's a hard quote to pass up.

Grace Jones released Slave to the Rhythm and played May Day in A View to a Kill. Not a bad year for her.

By the time he hit 37, Robert Dudley had already been imprisoned in the Tower of London, made Master of the Horse, been Elizabeth I's lover, lost his first wife under suspicious circumstances, was suggested as a potential husband for Mary, Queen of Scots, and was named the first Earl of Leicester. Busy guy.

Alton Parker was in his last year as a judge in the Supreme Court of New York, from whence he would rise to head the state's Court of Appeals and be the Democratic nominee for President in 1904.

Finally, we have Ben Hebard Fuller, who was still near the start of his career in the Marines. He was stationed in Hawaii when he was 37, having already fought with distinction in the Phillipines and China.

So there you have it. I've not been made a judge or canoodled with a monarch, but I've also not been to prison or made to pretend I find Roger Moore sexy.

Book Log 2006 # 32: Fiasco: A History of Hollywood's Iconic Flops by James Robert Parish.

Parish picks 15 flops - from Cleopatra to Town & Country and gives a history of why each failed, often being doomed to failure at the start. Not surprisingly, a combination of ego and money figures prominently in each.

Which is kind of the problem with the book - the failiures get repetitious. Each has its own details, of course, but rampant ego is still rampant ego. And while there are details, the length of any given chapter isn't quite long enough to give the depth of detail - or some of the juicy tidbits that often give these failures added color - that would make each failure truly unique.

If you're interested in any of the films covered in the book, you're probably better off finding something written specifically about the film. If you're just looking for basics or an overview, this book would suffice

Updates galore!

House - we had our home inspection on Thursday, and it was pretty much what we expected. The vast majority of problems are related to age and lack of proper maintenance. So while there's a pretty significant list of repairs, none of them were unexpected.

We're hammering out the financial things at a reasonable clip, still on course for our closing.

Work - we're registering incoming students, getting ready to graduate a bunch of seniors, and working with a pretty large group who are still getting financing in line. Today marks my one-year anniversary at the job (the actual date is tomorrow, but I started on this Monday last year), and I'm finally getting used to the rhythms of the office's combined missions. And as busy as it will get, I'll still get home at a normal hour most nights, which was pretty much unheard of when I was working in residence life.

Not that I don't miss certain aspects of that work, but I like getting home and finding my wife is still awake, or that I can actually celebrate my nephews' birthdays with them, rather than by proxy.

Life - speaking of the wife, spent the weekend with the in-laws in Maine. Got a couple of presents, had a family cookout, and went to the annual yard sale of my father-in-law's American Legion post. Most of the items purchased there will be given away in November to a few unlucky trash players, though I am keeping this word game.

Ephemera - my fantasy football league's annual draft is coming up on Sunday, and I'm woefully underprepared. Which is pretty much the way it's been the last couple of years. I find myself putting less effort into fantasy sports in general now than in the past, not sure what that means. Were it only in my league I'd assume it comes from the added work in running the league. But it also includes all the free games at ESPN and Yahoo (mostly the former), so I don't think it's that.

I've also not wanted to be on the computer as much when I'm home, given the heat we've had and how it tends to linger in the front room. That's a partial lame excuse for not blogging as frequently as usual.

Not too much else going on. Trying to keep up with a few summer series, missed on recording Life on Mars from the start and now don't know if/when I'll start it.

Which reminds me, head on over to Mike Burger's blog and follow the link to the Alison LaPlaca Open, his annual TV dead pool. I'll be defending my "I can't pick the rating for the Super Bowl" streak of picking 10 shows that get cancelled but losing the tie-breaker.

You should also point yourself to Craig's blog for his sidekick tournament, and to the Bruce's blog for a link to a tournament seeking out the wussiest song ever.

We finally got back to bar trivia last night, and cruised to a pretty solid victory, even though I almost gave it away by doing the math wrong on the final question. Good thing Allyson asked me to check the math, otherwise I'd have hosed us.

Your questions:

In what movie does Madonna make her acting debut, playing the lead singer of a band? Vision Quest (Greg) - At least that's the answer that was accepted as correct. I checked IMDB, and A Certain Sacrifice is there, but there's no release date given. They list Vision Quest's US release date as February 15, 1985. So it still could be correct. Maybe.

For what country can you add two letters to the end of its capital's name and come up with the name of the country? Tunisia or Brasil (OTC and Greg) - OTC is right if we're only talking English, while Greg is correct if I'm taking other languages. I don't think the original question made a difference, but they were looking for Tunisia. OTC, if the question sounds familiar, it could be because it was a Final Jeopardy a week or two ago. At least that's where we remembered it from.

What actress, born in New York City in 1949, derived her unusual first name from The Great Gatsby? Sigourney Weaver (Greg) - we had no idea, and never came within yelling distance of Weaver. We wound up guessing Stockard Channing, whose name is unusual, but perhaps not as unusual as Sigourney. For those who care, it's the name of Jordan Baker's aunt.

Which of the Ivy League schools was founded the latest? Cornell (Mike B.) - Founded in 1865, it's the only Ivy League school founded in the 19th century. We were kicking around Brown for a while, but it's not even the second-youngest Ivy. Dartmouth beats it by four years.

What sport is played according to the Cartwright Rules? Baseball (Chris) - His comment pretty much tells you what you need to know here. I think this was the only sports question all night. Round seemed pretty geography-heavy, which seems to work out for us. There was even another question on New Zealand, a country which has come up the last four or five times we've played.

What brand of car is named for the daughter of Emil Jellinek? Mercedes (Paul) - According to Wikipedia (FWIW), Jellinek not only gave his daughter's name to the company, but he later appended it to his own last name, becoming Emil Jellinek-Mercedes. I wonder at what point his daughter went from being flattered to being a little scared?

What US state capital is named for a boundary marker used to mark off territory for two Native American tribes? Baton Rouge (Mike B.) - The boundary marker, which separated hunting areas for two different groups of the Houma nation, was apparently red thanks to the blood coming from the animal and fish heads that decorated the stick. Yum.

This was the final question of the night (seemingly much easier than the Sigourney Weaver question, given the relative number of teams that got each correct), and had I not been reminded to check my math, we'd have lost by four points. There was some call to bet the maximum, which I might have to heed next time just in case.